Unexplained cash deposits in agricultural overdraft accounts may be partly sustained on estimate, while amended section 115BBE applies prospectively.

Cash deposits in an agricultural overdraft account were not treated as wholly unexplained under section 69A because the account context supported an agricultural source, even though complete land, crop, sale and cultivation records were not produced. In the absence of adverse Revenue material showing any other undisclosed source, only 50% of the deposits was sustained as unexplained on a reasonable-estimation basis, with the balance accepted as explained. The sustained addition was also held not liable to the amended enhanced tax rate under section 115BBE for Assessment Year 2017-18, as that regime applies prospectively from 01.04.2017, and tax was confined to normal rates.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether cash deposits in an agricultural overdraft account were wholly liable to be treated as unexplained money under section 69A; (ii) whether the sustained addition could be brought to tax under section 115BBE for the assessment year in question.

Issue (i): whether cash deposits in an agricultural overdraft account were wholly liable to be treated as unexplained money under section 69A.

Analysis: The account was an agricultural overdraft account, which supported the assessee's explanation that the deposits were linked to agricultural activity. At the same time, the assessee did not produce complete supporting material such as land, crop, sale, or cultivation records to fully establish the source of the deposits. No adverse material was brought by the Revenue to show any undisclosed business or other identified source, and the addition rested mainly on insufficiency of evidence. In these circumstances, a reasonable estimation was found appropriate.

Conclusion: The entire deposit was not treated as unexplained. Only 50% of the cash deposits was sustained as unexplained money under section 69A, and the balance was accepted as reasonably explained.

Issue (ii): whether the sustained addition could be brought to tax under section 115BBE for the assessment year in question.

Analysis: The binding jurisdictional High Court ruling was followed to hold that the enhanced rate under the amended section 115BBE applies only to transactions on or after 01.04.2017 and does not govern Assessment Year 2017-18.

Conclusion: The sustained addition was held not chargeable under the amended section 115BBE and was directed to be taxed only at the normal rates.

Final Conclusion: The addition was reduced to half of the cash deposits, and the surviving addition was kept outside the enhanced tax regime, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee's explanation for cash deposits is only partly substantiated and surrounding circumstances support the claimed source, the addition may be sustained on a reasonable-estimation basis; the amended enhanced-tax regime under section 115BBE operates prospectively from 01.04.2017.

---