Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for underreporting of income in consequence of misreporting of income arising from non-disclosure of capital gains on redemption of mutual funds.
Analysis: The additions made in assessment towards short-term capital gains and long-term capital gains from redemption of mutual funds were accepted by the assessee. The Tribunal held that section 270A contemplates underreporting as the difference between returned income and assessed income, and that the failure to record the receipts from redemption of mutual funds in the return constituted misreporting within section 270A(9)(e). The explanation of inadvertent omission and reliance on the cited Supreme Court decision was found inapplicable on the facts, as the case involved non-disclosure of income rather than a mere human error in making a claim.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 270A was rightly levied and sustained; the appeal was liable to be dismissed.
Final Conclusion: The penalty order was upheld in full and the assessee obtained no relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee fails to disclose receipts giving rise to taxable income in the return, and the omission results in a difference between returned income and assessed income, the case falls within underreporting in consequence of misreporting for the purposes of section 270A.