Mediclaim benefits are not deductible from motor accident compensation because they arise from a separate insurance contract.

Mediclaim or medical insurance benefits are not deductible from motor accident compensation because they arise from a separate contractual arrangement funded by premiums, not from the accident itself. The Motor Vehicles Act requires just compensation, but deductions are justified only where the receipt is from the same source and is a substitute for the same loss. Accordingly, amounts received under a Mediclaim policy cannot be set off against compensation awarded by the MACT, including claims made under the head of medical expenses.

---

---

Issues: Whether amounts received by a claimant under a Mediclaim or medical insurance policy are deductible from compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, including under the head of medical expenses.

Analysis: The governing principle in motor accident compensation is to award just compensation without duplication for the same head of loss. Deductions are ordinarily justified only where the receipt has the same source and nature as the loss compensated, or where it is a substitute for the very loss arising from the accident. By contrast, Mediclaim is a contractual benefit purchased by payment of premiums and does not arise from the accident itself. Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act is a statutory entitlement triggered by the accident, whereas reimbursement under a Mediclaim policy flows from a separate contractual arrangement. Treating the two as overlapping would ignore the distinct source of the benefit and would unfairly deprive the claimant of the contractual advantage purchased in advance.

Conclusion: Mediclaim or medical insurance amounts are not deductible from compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, even when medical expenses are claimed before the Tribunal.

---