Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for non-deduction of tax at source on computer licence fee and recruitment expenses could survive when the corresponding income had been settled by the deductee under the Direct Taxes Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and consequential relief was claimed by the deductor.
Analysis: The transfer pricing ground was withdrawn as it did not survive after resolution under the Mutual Agreement Procedure. The ground relating to late payment of provident fund contribution under section 36(1)(va) was not pressed. For the surviving disallowance under section 40(a)(i), the assessee relied on the CBDT Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16.12.2024, including FAQ No. 58, which clarifies that where the deductee has settled the tax liability under the scheme, corresponding consequential relief should also be available to the deductor. The Revenue accepted this position.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was directed to be deleted and the ground was allowed in favour of the assessee.