Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay in filing the customs appeal could be condoned despite the statutory limitation, so that the petitioner is not left without an effective remedy against the confiscation order.
Analysis: The appeal was filed beyond the ordinary period and beyond the appellate authority's condonable extension under the Customs Act. However, the Court noted that the delay was not inordinate on the facts of the case and that refusal to condone it would leave the petitioner remediless against the confiscation order. Emphasis was placed on the statutory right of appeal and on the need to avoid denial of appellate review in the peculiar circumstances of the case.
Conclusion: The delay was condoned in the facts of the case and the order dismissing the appeal as time-barred was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where refusal to condone delay would extinguish the only appellate remedy and the delay is not exorbitant on the facts, the delay may be condoned in the interests of justice notwithstanding the appellate authority's limited statutory power.