Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether input tax credit could be denied to a bona fide purchasing dealer solely because the supplier allegedly failed to deposit the tax collected, and whether the consequential demand, interest and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The writ petition was decided by applying the earlier Division Bench ruling that a purchaser who has entered into genuine transactions with a registered supplier and has complied with the statutory requirements cannot be penalised for the supplier's default in depositing tax. The proper remedy in such a situation lies against the defaulting supplier, while the Department may proceed against the purchaser only where material exists to show lack of bona fides or collusion.
Conclusion: Denial of input tax credit on the sole ground of the supplier's failure to remit tax was not justified, and the impugned demand and appellate order were liable to be set aside in favour of the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The assessment and appellate orders were quashed, while leaving open the authorities' liberty to proceed in accordance with law if the transactions are found to be non-bona fide or collusive.
Ratio Decidendi: A bona fide purchasing dealer cannot be denied input tax credit merely because the supplier failed to deposit the tax collected from the purchaser, unless the Department establishes collusion or absence of bona fide transactions.