Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2015-16 was barred by limitation and consequently invalid.
Analysis: The assessee was issued notice under Section 148A(b) and the order under Section 148A(d) was passed thereafter, but the notice under Section 148 was issued after the expiry of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The amended reassessment regime under Section 149 was held to operate prospectively, and for assessment years beginning on or before 01.04.2021, the first proviso to Section 149(1) preserves the bar under the unamended six-year limitation where a notice could not have been issued earlier. The Tribunal followed binding jurisdictional precedent and held that the period between the show-cause notice and the order under Section 148A(d) could not extend the substantive limitation so as to validate an otherwise time-barred notice.
Conclusion: The notice under Section 148 was held to be barred by limitation and invalid, and the reassessment was quashed.