Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment for assessment year 2021-22 was required to be framed under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the basis of the date of recording of satisfaction and receipt of seized material, instead of under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessment year in question was held to fall within the six assessment years to be counted from the deemed date of search, i.e. the date on which the satisfaction note was recorded and the seized material was received by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer of the non-searched person. The legal position was treated as settled by the Supreme Court and the jurisdictional High Court, which held that the relevant block period under section 153C is to be reckoned from that date and not from the date of the original search. On that basis, the year under consideration fell within the six-year block period applicable to proceedings under section 153C.
Conclusion: The assessment ought to have been made under section 153C and not under section 143(3); the contrary assessment and notice were held unsustainable, and the Revenue's challenge failed.