Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether earthwork, embankment formation, road rolling and water filling undertaken as sub-contracted activities for road works were covered by the exemption for services provided by way of construction of a road under Serial No. 13(a) of Notification No. 25/2012-Service Tax dated 20.06.2012.
Analysis: The work orders showed that the appellant was engaged in embankment construction, earthwork, rolling and watering, all of which formed part of the chain of activities necessary for road construction. Such activities, though preparatory in character, were held to be intrinsic and essential components of road construction and could not be artificially severed from the exempted service. A harmonious reading of the exemption entry required the term "construction" to include the full range of activities culminating in road construction, including site preparation and allied works. The Tribunal also relied on earlier decisions treating similar road-related activities as part of the exempt construction of roads.
Conclusion: The disputed activities were held to fall within the exemption for road construction services, and the demand of service tax, interest and penalty was not sustainable.