Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay in filing the statutory appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could be condoned by applying Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was treated as a special limitation provision forming part of a self-contained fiscal code. The appellate forum could extend time only to the extent permitted by Section 107(4), and there was no statutory basis for invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The appeal had been filed beyond the outer permissible period, and the absence of an express or implied incorporation of the Limitation Act excluded condonation beyond that limit.
Conclusion: The delay was not condonable under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the challenge to the appellate order failed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was rejected as having no merit, leaving the impugned appellate order and cancellation of registration undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the GST appellate provision prescribes a complete and self-contained limitation scheme without expressly extending the benefit of the Limitation Act, general condonation provisions do not apply beyond the statutory outer limit.