Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was barred by limitation and whether delay beyond the prescribed period could be condoned under Section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The prescribed period for presenting the appeal was two months from receipt of the order, with a further condonable period of one month on sufficient cause being shown. The order-in-original was received on 06.04.2015 and the appeal was filed on 14.07.2015, rendering it beyond the outer limit of condonable delay. The preamble in the order-in-original could not enlarge the statutory period of limitation. The statutory bar on extending limitation beyond the additional one month was applied.
Conclusion: The appeal was time-barred, the delay could not be condoned beyond the statutory limit, and the rejection of the appeal was upheld.