Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition should be entertained in view of the availability of an appellate remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal, and whether the petitioner must comply with the statutory pre-deposit and filing timeline for availing that remedy.
Analysis: The dispute arose from an assessment order under Section 73 of the GST Act that had been affirmed in appeal. The Court noted that the appellate remedy under Section 112 had become available, the GST Appellate Tribunal was functional, and the filing window for appeals had been extended through the notified timeline and user advisory. It also recorded the statutory condition under sub-section (8) of Section 112 requiring deposit of the admitted dues and ten per cent of the disputed tax before an appeal can be filed. The Court reiterated that writ jurisdiction may be invoked when the appellate forum is unavailable, but once the statutory forum is functional, the aggrieved person must pursue that remedy in the manner prescribed by the statute.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained on merits and the petitioner was directed to pursue the appellate remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal after complying with the pre-deposit requirement and the prescribed filing timeline.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of by relegating the petitioner to the statutory appellate forum, with directions to comply with the conditions for filing and entertaining the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory appellate tribunal is functional, the writ court should ordinarily defer to the alternate remedy and insist on strict compliance with the statutory pre-condition for appeal.