Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 270A(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for alleged under-reporting and misreporting of income where the capital gains on sale of agricultural land were omitted from the original return but were disclosed in response to notice under section 148 and accepted in assessment.
Analysis: The return filed in response to notice under section 148 reflected the capital gains and the assessment was completed accepting that return. On the facts, the Tribunal held that the comparison for applying section 270A had to be made with the return filed in response to section 148, and not in the manner suggested by the Revenue. The assessee's explanation that the land transaction was believed to be non-taxable was found to be bona fide, and the material facts relating to the sale were disclosed when called upon.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 270A(9) was not sustainable and was deleted, in favour of the assessee.