Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest on borrowed funds invested by a partner as capital in a firm is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The appellant borrowed money and invested it as capital in the firm of which she was a partner. The claimed deduction was examined against the requirement that interest must relate to capital borrowed for the purpose of the assessee's own business or profession. Since the admitted position was that the firm carried on the business and the appellant herself was not conducting any business on her own, the borrowed funds could not be treated as capital borrowed for the appellant's business purpose. The claimed deduction was therefore not available to her.
Conclusion: The claim for deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) was rejected and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest on money borrowed by an assessee and invested merely as capital in a firm is not deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) unless the borrowing is for the assessee's own business or profession.