Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether repair and maintenance overhauling charges paid to non-resident entities for helicopter parts constituted fees for technical services so as to attract tax deduction obligations and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payments related to repair and overhaul of helicopter parts sent outside India to non-resident vendors. The Tribunal followed its own earlier decision in the assessee's case and held that, for treaty jurisdictions containing a make available condition, repair services performed abroad did not result in making available technical knowledge, skill, or know-how to the assessee. In the absence of such make available element, the receipts did not qualify as fees for technical services under the relevant DTAAs. By virtue of section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the more beneficial treaty provisions prevailed over the domestic charging provisions. Since the payments were not chargeable to tax in India, section 195 was not attracted.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was unsustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.