TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an addition under section 68 could be sustained in respect of share application money or share premium when the assessee showed that there was no fresh credit or transaction in the relevant year and the amount stood as an opening balance in the audited accounts.
Analysis: The addition was founded on the assumption that the assessee had received share application money and share premium during the year. The audited balance sheets placed on record showed that the security premium balance remained unchanged between the opening and closing figures for the relevant year, and there was no increase in share capital or share premium during that period. In such circumstances, the question of calling upon the assessee to explain the source of a non-existent fresh credit did not arise. The approach of the first appellate authority in sustaining the addition merely on the basis of non-compliance before the Assessing Officer, without examining the core factual contention, was held to be unsustainable. The matter was, however, left subject to factual verification of the audited accounts produced before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 could not be sustained on the facts as recorded, and the assessee succeeded, subject to verification of the audited accounts.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 68 cannot be invoked for an opening balance or carried-forward capital receipt in the absence of a fresh credit or transaction in the relevant year, and such an addition must rest on a proper factual basis.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
