Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 2,17,00,000/- under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of unsecured loans was sustainable where the assessee produced lender confirmation, PAN, bank statements, ITR, balance sheet, ledger, compliance to notice under section 133(6), and evidence of subsequent repayment through banking channels.
Analysis: The assessee discharged the primary burden by placing on record material establishing the identity of the lender, the genuineness of the loan transactions and the lender's creditworthiness. The transactions were routed through banking channels, were reflected in the books, and were followed by repayment in subsequent assessment years. The Revenue did not bring any cogent material to rebut these documents or to establish a live link showing that the transactions were fictitious or represented unexplained money. The authorities below also could not justify treating the transaction as an engineered or accommodation entry arrangement. The principles that once primary documents are produced the onus shifts to the Revenue, and that the assessee is not required to prove source of source in such circumstances, were applied.
Conclusion: The addition under section 69A was deleted and the assessee's appeal was allowed.