Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to equitable indulgence to clear the admitted GST liability in instalments and obtain revocation of the attachment notices issued for recovery under the GST recovery provisions.
Analysis: The petitioner admitted the tax liability and filed an undertaking to pay the admitted amount within a specified time after revocation of the attachment. The Court took note of the recovery action initiated by attachment notices issued under the GST recovery mechanism and of the petitioner's willingness to discharge the dues. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the assessment or on levy of statutory interest, the Court moulded the relief on the basis of the undertaking and the admitted liability. It directed an initial deposit of fifty per cent of the admitted amount, ordered revocation of the attachment notices upon proof of such deposit, and allowed payment of the balance in two equated instalments within two months from revocation. It further preserved the authority's right to proceed in accordance with law in case of default.
Conclusion: The request for instalment-based payment was accepted in part and relief was granted subject to compliance with the undertaking and deposit conditions; the attachment was ordered to be revoked upon the stipulated initial payment.