TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for misreporting of income on account of the revised return and claim relating to income from a foreign company, and whether absence of appeal against the quantum addition established misreporting.
Analysis: The assessee's stand was based on a legal claim concerning Place of Effective Management and the applicability of CBDT circulars, and the material facts relating to the foreign company and the receipt were disclosed. The reduction in returned income in the revised return, by itself, did not establish deliberate misrepresentation or suppression of facts. Rejection of the claim in assessment did not automatically convert the matter into misreporting, particularly where the issue was debatable and the explanation was found to be bona fide. Non-filing of an appeal against the quantum addition could not, by itself, be treated as an admission of concealment, because assessment and penalty proceedings are separate and independent.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not sustainable and was deleted. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
