Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of GST registration and the appellate order rejecting the statutory appeal as time-barred should be interfered with, and whether the registration could be restored despite procedural defaults, subject to compliance with return filing and tax payments.
Analysis: The writ court entertained the petition notwithstanding the availability of an alternative statutory remedy, as the period for appeal including the grace period had expired and the cancellation was founded on curable procedural non-compliance. The Court held that such procedural lapses should not defeat substantive rights where the defects are capable of being remedied. It further relied on the settled approach that cancellation on procedural grounds should not foreclose restoration when the assessee is willing to regularise defaults and make the requisite payments.
Conclusion: The cancellation order and the appellate order were set aside and quashed. The petitioner was directed to file returns for the period of default and pay the requisite tax, interest, fine and penalty within the stipulated time, and upon such compliance the GST registration was to be restored; failing compliance, the benefit of the order would not enure to the petitioner.