Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ready mix concrete manufactured at construction sites was dutiable as distinct from concrete mix, and whether the demand, interest, and penalty could be sustained when the goods were found to be site-manufactured concrete mix.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the controversy was no longer res integra and had already been settled by the Supreme Court and earlier Tribunal orders distinguishing ready mix concrete from concrete mix. It relied on the accepted characteristics of ready mix concrete as a product manufactured through a batching plant with controlled weighing, mixing, and transportation, while site-mixed concrete fell within the conventional method of concrete production used at the construction site. The Tribunal also referred to its earlier decision in the appellant's own case, where exemption had been allowed for concrete mix manufactured at site in the absence of admissible evidence showing manufacture of ready mix concrete. Applying the same reasoning, the Tribunal found the present appeals covered by those precedents.
Conclusion: The goods were treated as concrete mix manufactured at site and not as dutiable ready mix concrete, and the demand, interest, and penalty were unsustainable.