Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a solitary show-cause notice clubbing multiple tax periods is legally valid under the CGST/KGST regime, and whether the consequential adjudication order could be sustained.
Analysis: The challenge was confined to the jurisdictional validity of issuing one notice covering multiple tax periods. The Court followed the earlier coordinate bench view that consolidation or bunching of distinct tax periods in a single show-cause notice under the GST enactments is impermissible and without authority of law. Since the defect went to jurisdiction, the notice and the adjudication order founded on it could not be sustained. The Court also recorded the petitioner's willingness to face fresh proceedings by separate notices for each tax period, and reserved liberty to the revenue to proceed accordingly.
Conclusion: The composite show-cause notice was held invalid, and the adjudication order based on it was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The proceeding was disposed of by nullifying the impugned notice and order on the jurisdictional ground while permitting the revenue to initiate separate proceedings for the relevant tax periods.
Ratio Decidendi: Clubbing multiple tax periods in a single GST show-cause notice is impermissible and jurisdictionally unsustainable; any adjudication based on such notice cannot stand.