Penalty proceedings linked to pending tax appeals kept in abeyance until the Tribunal decides the connected disputes.

Penalty proceedings under Section 271C based on the same tax dispute as the pending assessment appeals were kept in abeyance. The Court noted that the petitioner had already challenged the assessment-related orders before the Tribunal, had made substantial deposits against the disputed demand, and that recovery proceedings arising from the same controversy had earlier been stayed. In that setting, the Court maintained status quo and protected the parties' positions by directing that the penalty action remain suspended until the Tribunal decided the connected appeals.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned penalty proceedings under Section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 should be kept in abeyance pending disposal of the petitioner's appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Analysis: The petitioner had already challenged the underlying assessment orders in appeal and had also made substantial deposits towards the disputed demand. The earlier orders recorded that recovery proceedings arising from the assessment-related disputes were being kept in abeyance, and the present writ petition arose from a penalty notice founded on the same tax controversy. In that backdrop, and noting that the petitioner had filed appeals against the appellate orders and that those appeals were expected to be taken up in due course, the Court considered it appropriate to protect the parties' positions by maintaining the status quo on the penalty proceedings until the Tribunal rendered its decisions.

Conclusion: The impugned penalty proceedings were directed to remain in abeyance until orders are passed by the Tribunal in the respective appeals, which is in favour of the petitioner.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of with protection against coercive continuation of the penalty action pending the Tribunal's decision in the connected appeals.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the substantive tax dispute is already carried in appeal and adequate deposit has been made to secure the revenue, penalty proceedings based on the same dispute may be kept in abeyance until the appellate forum decides the matter.

---