Belated return treated as non-est, blocking section 80P deduction and removing the need for section 143(2) notice.

A return filed beyond the statutory time limits under sections 139 and 142 was treated as non-est, so the assessee's Chapter VI-A claim for deduction under section 80P could not be entertained because the claim had to be made in a valid return. On that basis, notice under section 143(2) was held unnecessary, and the challenge to service of notice under section 142(1) failed because service was supported by the record. The assessment under section 144 was sustained and the appeal failed in full.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80P could be allowed when the return of income was filed beyond the time permitted under sections 139 and 142 and was treated as invalid or non-est; (ii) whether notice under section 143(2) was required in respect of such an invalid return and whether the service of notice under section 142(1) was proved.

Issue (i): whether the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80P could be allowed when the return of income was filed beyond the time permitted under sections 139 and 142 and was treated as invalid or non-est.

Analysis: The return was filed after the statutory time limits and was therefore not a valid return for the purposes of the Act. The claim for deduction under Chapter VI-A had to be made in a valid return, and section 80A(5) operated as an additional statutory condition. Since the assessee's return was non-est, the deduction claim under section 80P could not be entertained. The interpretation was supported by the authorities relied upon, which treated the making of the claim in a valid return as mandatory.

Conclusion: The disallowance of deduction under section 80P was upheld and this issue was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether notice under section 143(2) was required in respect of such an invalid return and whether the service of notice under section 142(1) was proved.

Analysis: Once the return was held to be non-est, the statutory requirement of notice under section 143(2) did not arise. The record also showed service of the notice under section 142(1), including the assessee's own earlier reference to that notice and the electronic availability of the notice on the filing portal.

Conclusion: No notice under section 143(2) was required, and the challenge to service of notice under section 142(1) failed; this issue was decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed in its entirety because the assessee's belated return was treated as invalid, the deduction claim under section 80P was not maintainable, and the assessment completed under section 144 was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: A deduction under Chapter VI-A can be allowed only when the claim is made in a valid return recognised under the Act, and a return filed beyond the permissible statutory period is non-est so as to negate the requirement of notice under section 143(2).

---