Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether banks were entitled to avail CENVAT credit of service tax paid on premium for deposit insurance obtained from the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the deposit insurance premium qualified as an input service for the banks. The controversy had already been resolved against the Revenue by the decision of the Larger Bench and thereafter by the High Court of Kerala, with similar approval by the Bombay High Court. In light of those decisions, the issue was treated as no longer res integra. The Court found no basis to take a different view and followed the earlier binding reasoning.
Conclusion: The banks were entitled to CENVAT credit on the premium paid for deposit insurance, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.