Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under section 80P could be denied by way of prima facie adjustment under section 143(1) on the ground that the return was filed beyond the due date under section 139(1) for assessment year 2015-16, and whether the amended section 80AC applied retrospectively to bar the claim.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the controversy stood covered by earlier coordinate bench decisions holding that the amendment to section 80AC, which extended the due-date filing condition to deductions under Chapter VI-A including section 80P, operated only prospectively from assessment year 2018-19. It further held that, for the relevant year, there was no enabling provision permitting disallowance of section 80P deduction at the processing stage merely because the return was filed late, since the issue was debatable and lay outside the limited scope of adjustments under section 143(1).
Conclusion: The denial of deduction under section 80P through processing under section 143(1) was unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the deduction claimed.
Ratio Decidendi: An amendment enlarging the due-date filing condition for Chapter VI-A deductions is prospective where so held, and a debatable claim for section 80P deduction cannot be disallowed as a prima facie adjustment under section 143(1) for an earlier assessment year.