Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, being unable to file the statutory appeal electronically, could be permitted to pursue manual filing of the appeal and related representation for condonation of delay.
Analysis: The order under challenge was held to be appealable under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the writ remedy was not treated as the proper course where the statutory appellate remedy remained available. The Court recognized that the right of appeal is a substantive statutory right and should not be defeated by a technical difficulty in electronic filing. On the stated facts, where electronic filing could not be effectively pursued, the Court directed that a representation be made to the Commissioner for permission to file the appeal manually along with an application for condonation of delay.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to seek manual filing of the appeal by making the appropriate representation, with liberty to seek condonation of delay.