Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty order under Section 271C was barred by limitation under Section 275(1)(c).
Analysis: The penalty proceedings were initiated by the revenue authorities through a reference and show-cause process, but the order imposing penalty was passed after the expiry of the limitation period prescribed under Section 275(1)(c). The governing principle applied was that where the statutory time limit for passing the penalty order has expired, the order cannot survive, even if the underlying default relates to failure to deduct tax at source under Chapter XVIIB.
Conclusion: The penalty order was barred by limitation and was quashed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A penalty order passed after the expiry of the limitation period under Section 275(1)(c) is void and liable to be set aside.