Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner (Appeals) had power to condone delay in filing the customs appeal beyond the further period of 30 days prescribed under Section 128(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: Section 128(1) permits an appeal to be filed within 60 days from the date of service of the order and its proviso authorises condonation only for a further period of 30 days on sufficient cause being shown. The appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed even beyond that extended period. The statutory language leaves no scope for condonation beyond the outer limit, and the principle applicable under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not enlarge that jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The Commissioner (Appeals) had no power to condone the delay beyond the prescribed outer limit, and the dismissal of the appeal was correct.