Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, instead of pursuing the writ petition, should be granted liberty to file a statutory appeal against the order-in-original and Form GST DRC-07 with a delay condonation application and statutory pre-deposit, while interim protection is granted against coercive recovery.
Analysis: The petitioner expressed readiness to invoke the appellate remedy and to accompany the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit and an application for condonation of delay. The Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge in writ jurisdiction and permitted the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal, preserving all grounds available in law and on facts. The appellate authority was directed to consider the explanation for delay in light of the circumstances and, if satisfied, decide the appeal on merits. Protection was also granted for the limited period allowed for filing the appeal, by restraining coercive steps pursuant to the garnishee notice.
Conclusion: The petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy with liberty to seek condonation of delay and with interim protection against coercive action for two weeks.