Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice issued for Assessment Year 2015-16 after 01.04.2021 was barred by limitation and whether the subsequent notice under section 148A, order under section 148A(d), and reassessment order could survive; and whether the additions on merits required adjudication once the reassessment foundation was found invalid.
Analysis: The reassessment notice under section 148 was issued on 07.06.2021 for Assessment Year 2015-16. The governing legal position, as applied by the Court, was that notices for this assessment year issued on or after 01.04.2021 fall outside the permissible limitation period. Once the original notice is time-barred, the defect is jurisdictional in nature and cannot be cured by subsequent procedural steps, including proceedings under section 148A or the reassessment order passed thereafter. The deeming fiction applied in the transitional reassessment framework does not extend or revive a notice that is already barred by limitation.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice was invalid and the consequential proceedings could not survive.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings and the resulting additions were quashed on the ground of limitation, and the merits of the additions were left unexamined as academic.
Ratio Decidendi: For Assessment Year 2015-16, a reassessment notice issued on or after 01.04.2021 is time-barred and void, and such a jurisdictional defect cannot be cured by subsequent proceedings under the reassessment scheme.