Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the original adjudication order was liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in view of the claimed exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST, the plea of limitation, and the contention that the demand travelled beyond the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The adjudication was found to have proceeded on inputs drawn from Form 26AS and TDS statements. In the circumstances, and also keeping in view the earlier directions requiring the authorities to consider whether the services fall within the statutory definition, the negative list, the exemption notification, the liability to tax, and limitation, the matter required reconsideration at the stage of reply to the show-cause notice. The petitioner was also permitted to place additional reply before the authority, and all contentions were left open for fresh adjudication.
Conclusion: The original order was set aside and the matter was remitted for reconsideration from the stage of the show-cause notice, in favour of the petitioner.