Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty under section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was barred by limitation under section 275(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the facts of the case.
Analysis: The relevant limitation under section 275(1)(c) runs from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated, and the provision requires strict construction in fiscal matters. The initiation of penalty proceedings is the first introductory step taken for the purposes of penalty, and a later show-cause notice does not defer the commencement where the reference for penalty has already been made. On the facts found, the penalty order was passed beyond the prescribed limitation period.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 271C was time-barred and unsustainable; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.