Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition ought to have been relegated to the statutory appellate remedy under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 despite the interim order and the plea of lack of jurisdiction in the provisional attachment proceedings.
Analysis: The availability of an efficacious statutory appeal is a relevant consideration while exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. An interim order passed at an earlier stage does not compel final adjudication in writ proceedings in every case. The Court noted, however, that where an interim order makes impending action subject to the writ petition, the legality of the action would ordinarily be examined, though this is not an inflexible rule. The impugned order did not disclose a clear basis showing why the learned Single Judge declined to exercise writ jurisdiction or what aspect of the adjudication under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 led to relegation to the appellate remedy.
Conclusion: The writ court's order relegating the appellant to the statutory appeal was set aside and the writ petition was restored for fresh consideration, with all issues and pleas left open.