Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer pricing adjustment could be sustained on the basis of comparables whose functional profile was disputed, and whether the matter required reconsideration because the assessee's trading activity and the comparables' manufacturing activity were not adequately examined.
Analysis: The adjustment turned on comparability of the assessee with the selected companies. The record showed a conflict on the basic functional profile of the assessee, with one view treating it as a trader in iron ore and coal and the other treating it as engaged in production of ferrous products. The finding of comparability in the lower proceedings was found to be too cryptic and unsupported by adequate statistical or functional analysis. Since arm's length price determination depends on comparing functionally similar entities, a proper examination of the product profile and business activities of the assessee and the selected comparables was necessary before the adjustment could be affirmed.
Conclusion: The existing transfer pricing adjustment was not finally sustained. The matter was set aside for fresh examination by the Dispute Resolution Panel on the question of functional comparability and correct selection of comparables, in favour of the assessee.