Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudication order and the appellate order were liable to be set aside for want of opportunity of personal hearing in terms of Section 75(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the principles of natural justice.
Analysis: The petitioner was not afforded any personal hearing before the adverse adjudication order was passed. The statutory requirement under Section 75(4) mandates an opportunity of hearing before adverse action is taken, and the absence of such hearing amounted to a breach of natural justice and of the statutory procedure.
Conclusion: The adjudication order and the appellate order were set aside. The matter was permitted to be proceeded with afresh in accordance with law and after complying with Section 75(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.