Inherent recall powers cannot reopen a merits-based insolvency order using later-discovered documents after appellate affirmation.

Rule 11 inherent powers under the NCLT Rules cannot be used to review or reopen a merits-based order rejecting a Section 9 application on the basis of documents later claimed to have been discovered. The proper scope of recall is confined to exceptional defects such as fraud, collusion, inherent lack of jurisdiction, or mistake of the court; it does not extend to supplying evidence omitted from the original proceeding. Where the principal order has already been affirmed in appeal, reopening it by recall is further impermissible. On these principles, the recall application was not maintainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether a recall application under Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 was maintainable to reopen an order rejecting a Section 9 application on merits, on the ground of subsequently discovered documents, particularly after the principal order had been affirmed in appeal.

Analysis: The recalled order was a merits-based adjudication, and the asserted basis for recall was only the later discovery of documents said to support the original claim. Such a ground does not disclose an apparent procedural error or any inherent defect in the order sought to be recalled. The inherent powers under Rule 11 cannot be converted into a power of review, nor used to supply material that was not produced in the original proceeding. The Tribunal also noted that once the merits order had been affirmed in appeal, reopening it by recall was impermissible. The exceptions traditionally recognised for recall, such as fraud, collusion, inherent lack of jurisdiction, or mistake of the court, were not attracted.

Conclusion: The recall application was not maintainable, and the dismissal of the recall by the Tribunal was correct.

Ratio Decidendi: Inherent recall powers cannot be used to review or reopen a merits-based order, especially by relying on subsequently discovered documents or after the order has been affirmed in appeal.

---