Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rectification order was liable to be quashed for want of hearing and non-consideration of the petitioner's submissions, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The rectification order was challenged on the ground that it had been passed without granting an opportunity of being heard and without considering the legal and factual material placed by the petitioner. The authorities fairly accepted that the proceedings could be restored for a fresh hearing. In these circumstances, the appropriate course was to set aside the impugned order and direct de novo consideration by the designated authority, with liberty to issue a fresh notice, grant a personal hearing, and pass a reasoned and speaking order within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The rectification order was quashed and the proceedings were remanded for fresh consideration after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Final Conclusion: The dispute was sent back to the designated authority for reconsideration on merits with procedural safeguards, while all substantive contentions were kept open.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudicatory order that is passed without affording a hearing and without considering the party's material is liable to be set aside and remitted for fresh determination in accordance with natural justice.