Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether collection of affiliation fees by a statutory university amounts to a supply of service taxable under the GST laws, and whether the impugned GST levy and demand on such fees could be sustained.
Analysis: The university's power to grant affiliation arises from the State university legislation and is exercised in discharge of statutory duties connected with dissemination of education, regulation of colleges, inspection of infrastructure, and maintenance of educational standards. Such activity is not commercial in character and does not fall within the ordinary meaning of trade, commerce, or business under the GST framework. Since Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 applies only to supplies made for consideration in the course or furtherance of business, affiliation fees collected in performance of statutory functions do not answer that description. Once the activity itself is not a supply, the charging provision under Section 9 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 cannot be invoked, and the proper officer lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice and confirm the demand. The view is reinforced by the purposive understanding of education-related exemption and by the persuasive value of earlier decisions holding affiliation-related receipts of universities to be statutory and regulatory, not commercial.
Conclusion: Collection of affiliation fees by the university is not a taxable supply, the GST demand is unsustainable, and the impugned order-in-original could not be maintained.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeds and the impugned demand order and connected summary order are quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory university's collection of affiliation fees in discharge of regulatory and educational functions is not a supply made in the course or furtherance of business, and therefore falls outside the GST charging scheme.