Transfer pricing additions on warranty fees and overdue receivables fail where obligations are integral and working capital already captures receivables.

A transfer pricing adjustment for performance guarantee or product warranty fee was found unwarranted because the warranty obligations were commercially integral to the assessee's software development, licensing, maintenance and service contracts, and similar obligations were already undertaken with unrelated customers without separate charge. The adjustment for notional interest on overdue receivables was also rejected because receivables were already reflected in the TNMM working capital adjustment, the assessee's margin remained above comparables, and there was no evidence of disguised financing or a distinct loan arrangement. Both disputed additions were deleted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the transfer pricing adjustment made on account of performance guarantee or product warranty fee was justified; (ii) Whether the transfer pricing adjustment made on account of interest on overdue receivables was justified.

Issue (i): Whether the transfer pricing adjustment made on account of performance guarantee or product warranty fee was justified.

Analysis: The guarantees issued to the customers of the associated enterprises were found to be performance and product warranties intrinsically linked to the assessee's software development, licensing, maintenance, updates and professional service obligations. The obligations mirrored the assessee's own contractual responsibility and were commercially embedded in the principal transaction. Similar indemnity and performance obligations were also undertaken in contracts with unrelated customers without separate charge. In an earlier year on identical facts, no adjustment had been made, and no change in facts or law was shown.

Conclusion: The adjustment on account of guarantee fee was held to be unsustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the transfer pricing adjustment made on account of interest on overdue receivables was justified.

Analysis: The receivables were already factored into the arm's length analysis through working capital adjustment under TNMM, and the assessee's margin remained above the adjusted comparables' margin. The delay in realisation was explained as arising from bona fide business and COVID-related circumstances, and there was no material to show a disguised loan or a pattern of accommodation to associated enterprises. The assessee also did not charge interest on delayed receivables from non-associated enterprises, and the factual matrix showed a consistent distinction between trade receivables and separate lending transactions.

Conclusion: The notional interest adjustment on overdue receivables was held to be unjustified and was deleted in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: Only the two pressed transfer pricing issues were decided, and both were resolved for the assessee, resulting in partial allowance of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the effect of receivables is already absorbed in a working capital adjustment under TNMM, and a guarantee or warranty obligation is commercially integral to the principal transaction, separate transfer pricing additions on those counts are not warranted absent evidence of a distinct international service or financing benefit.

---