Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to avail input tax credit in view of the retrospective insertion of section 16(5) of the CGST Act, notwithstanding the restriction in section 16(4), and whether the impugned orders disallowing the credit could stand.
Analysis: The entitlement to input tax credit was examined against the later amendment inserting section 16(5), which operates notwithstanding section 16(4) and extends the time for availing credit for invoices or debit notes pertaining to the specified financial years up to 30.11.2021. The returns in question had been filed within the relevant extended period, and the legislative amendment, as clarified by the departmental circular and notification, was treated as applicable to the claim. On that basis, the disallowance of credit solely on limitation under section 16(4) was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to have the input tax credit claim reconsidered in the light of section 16(5), and the orders rejecting the claim were set aside with a remand for fresh adjudication.