Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner could be exempted from the statutory pre-deposit for filing the appeal under the GST regime, and whether liberty could be granted to file the appeal with delay condonation.
Analysis: The order-in-original had imposed tax, penalty, and interest under the CGST Act, 2017. The Court held that there is no exemption from the pre-deposit requirement for filing an appeal under the GST regime, and the disputed liability could be examined only in the appeal on merits. At the same time, since the petitioner had been in correspondence with the authorities and had missed the appeal limitation period, the Court granted liberty to file the appeal within two weeks along with the statutory deposit and a delay condonation application, leaving the appellate authority to consider delay sympathetically and decide the appeal in accordance with law.
Conclusion: Exemption from pre-deposit was declined, but liberty was granted to file the appeal with statutory deposit and seek condonation of delay.