Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a single composite assessment order covering more than one financial year under the GST regime is valid.
Analysis: The challenge was confined to the legality of passing one assessment order for multiple tax periods. The governing principle applied was that where assessment is undertaken for distinct tax periods, a single show-cause notice or composite assessment order cannot validly cover more than one tax period in the manner proscribed by the GST framework. Since the impugned order covered an extended period spanning several financial years, it was treated as unsustainable on this ground. Other grounds were not adjudicated and were left open.
Conclusion: The composite assessment order was held invalid and was set aside, with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the GST assessment scheme, a single composite assessment order cannot validly determine liability for more than one distinct tax period in the manner found impermissible by the Court.