Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the Committee of Creditors had approved the resolution plan and the application for approval was pending before the adjudicating authority, the Resolution Professional and the Committee of Creditors could seek withdrawal of that application and thereby defeat the approved plan.
Analysis: A resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors attains binding effect inter se the Committee of Creditors and the successful resolution applicant even before approval by the adjudicating authority. Once the approved plan has been submitted for approval, the insolvency framework does not permit the Committee of Creditors to take a decision that affects that plan, and Regulation 18(2) of the CIRP Regulations, 2016 restricts committee meetings to matters that do not affect the resolution plan submitted before the adjudicating authority. The later passage of time, alleged changes in feasibility, or the existence of a better recovery possibility do not confer jurisdiction on the Committee of Creditors to withdraw a plan already approved and pending consideration. The adjudicating authority therefore erred in allowing withdrawal of the approval application merely on the oral request of the Resolution Professional acting on the Committee of Creditors' mandate.
Conclusion: The withdrawal of the plan approval application was impermissible, and the impugned order could not be sustained; the approval application was required to be heard on merits.
Final Conclusion: The approved resolution plan could not be withdrawn at the instance of the Committee of Creditors, and the matter was restored for consideration in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors becomes binding on the Committee of Creditors and the successful resolution applicant, and no post-approval committee decision may be taken to withdraw or alter that plan once it has been submitted for adjudicatory approval.