Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under sections 11 and 12 could be denied merely because Form 10B was filed after the return but within the extended due date, and whether such filing amounted to non-compliance with section 12A.
Analysis: The assessee filed the return of income for the relevant assessment year and filed the audit report in Form 10B on the next day, but within the due date extended by the CBDT circular. The filing requirement under section 12A was therefore satisfied within the extended time permitted by law. In these circumstances, there was no delay requiring condonation, and the denial of exemption merely because the audit report was not filed along with the return was unsustainable. The processing adjustment made under section 143(1) was accordingly incorrect.
Conclusion: Exemption under sections 11 and 12 could not be denied, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.
Final Conclusion: The assessment adjustment was deleted and relief was directed to be granted to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the audit report required for charitable exemption is filed within the extended due date prescribed by the competent authority, the filing condition under section 12A stands complied with and exemption under sections 11 and 12 cannot be denied on the ground of delay.