Bona fide belief fails where a narrowed service tax exemption clearly excludes the assessee and supports extended limitation.

The amended service tax exemption under Notification No. 13/2003-ST, narrowed by Notification No. 08/2004-ST from 09.07.2004, applied only to commission agents dealing in sale or purchase of agricultural produce. As the assessee did not fall within that carve-out, the tax position was held to be clear and not ambiguous. Non-charging of tax by the appellant, and the claim that tax was paid only on receipt of consideration, were held insufficient to establish bona fide belief. The extended period of limitation was therefore validly invoked against the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant could claim bona fide belief and avoid invocation of the extended period of limitation for non-payment of service tax on commission income after the amendment of the exemption notification with effect from 09.07.2004.

Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 13/2003-ST was narrowed by Notification No. 08/2004-ST with effect from 09.07.2004, and only commission agents dealing in sale or purchase of agricultural produce continued to remain exempt. The appellant was not covered by that carve-out. In these circumstances, the statutory position was held to be clear and not susceptible to ambiguity. Non-payment of tax on the ground that tax had not been charged, and the plea that tax was paid only on receipt of consideration, were held insufficient to establish bona fide belief. The plea that the extended period could not be invoked was rejected.

Conclusion: The extended period of limitation was validly invoked and the plea of bona fide belief failed, against the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification is expressly restricted by amendment and the assessee falls outside the exempted class, ignorance of the clear tax liability does not constitute bona fide belief and can sustain invocation of the extended period of limitation.

---