Separate freight and insurance charges excluded from excisable value; penalty also unsustainable without suppression of facts.

Freight and insurance charges separately recovered from customers were excluded from the assessable value for central excise duty under transaction value principles, because there was no evidence that delivery at the buyer's premises was contractually required. The duty demand, interest and penalty founded on that inclusion were set aside. On the admitted CENVAT credit reversal, the reversal with interest was upheld, but penalty was not sustained because no suppression of facts with intent to evade duty was established.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether freight and insurance charges separately recovered from customers were includable in the assessable value for central excise duty; (ii) whether penalty was imposable on the confirmed CENVAT credit reversal of Rs.502/-.

Issue (i): Whether freight and insurance charges separately recovered from customers were includable in the assessable value for central excise duty.

Analysis: The demand was founded on inclusion of outward freight and insurance in the assessable value. No evidence was produced to show that the appellant was obliged to hand over goods at the buyer's premises. The charges were recovered separately from customers. Under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, valuation is based on transaction value, and freight or transportation expenses are not part of assessable value when separately billed. The stated principle was applied from the Supreme Court decision relied upon in the order.

Conclusion: The freight and insurance charges were not includable in the assessable value, and the demand of duty, with interest and penalty on that score, was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether penalty was imposable on the confirmed CENVAT credit reversal of Rs.502/-.

Analysis: The appellant accepted the credit reversal with interest. The order records that no suppression of facts with intent to evade duty was established. On that basis, the penal consequence was held unwarranted for the limited reversal confirmed in the appeal.

Conclusion: The credit reversal with interest was upheld, but the penalty was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the valuation issue and failed only to the extent of the admitted credit reversal, with penalty relief granted on that limited demand.

Ratio Decidendi: Freight and insurance charges separately recovered from customers are not includable in the assessable value under transaction value valuation, and penalty is not warranted absent suppression of facts with intent to evade duty.

---