Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the intimation under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid when the adjustment was made without prior notice to the assessee as required by the first proviso to section 143(1)(a).
Analysis: The adjustment was made while processing the return under section 143(1), but the revenue itself acknowledged that due to technical issues the adjustment notice was not triggered before processing. The statutory scheme permits only specified adjustments and requires intimation to the assessee before making such adjustment. Since no prior notice was issued, the mandatory procedure was not followed. The defect went to the legality of the processing itself and offended the requirement of audi alteram partem.
Conclusion: The intimation under section 143(1) was invalid and liable to be quashed. The issue is decided in favour of the assessee.