GST rate reduction must be passed on through lower prices; otherwise anti-profiteering, interest timing, and penalty limits apply.

Reduction in GST rate on cinema tickets required the supplier to pass on the benefit through a commensurate price reduction, and maintaining the same cum-tax prices while increasing the base price was treated as profiteering under Section 171. The discussion also notes that the reported computation of the profiteered amount was accepted on anti-profiteering methodology. Interest under Rule 133(3)(c) was described as operative only from 28.06.2019, so it applied only for the period after that date, and penalty under Section 171(3A) was stated to be inapplicable retrospectively because the provision came into force later.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the respondent complied with the High Court's directions while revising cinema ticket prices and was entitled to equitable relief; (ii) whether the respondent profiteered and contravened Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; (iii) whether interest was payable on the profiteered amount under Rule 133(3)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017; and (iv) whether penalty was leviable under Section 171(3A) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Issue (i): Whether the respondent complied with the High Court's directions while revising cinema ticket prices and was entitled to equitable relief.

Analysis: The price revision was examined against the earlier directions permitting theatres to collect proposed fares subject to informing the competent authorities and against the respondent's own inconsistent pleadings and omission to disclose material facts. The Tribunal found that the respondent did not establish strict compliance with the mandatory directions and that the conduct disclosed concealment of material facts and contradictory stands.

Conclusion: The respondent did not comply with the High Court's directions in true letter and spirit and was not entitled to equitable relief.

Issue (ii): Whether the respondent profiteered and contravened Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Analysis: The reduced GST rate on cinema tickets required the benefit to be passed on by commensurate reduction in prices. The respondent's maintenance of the same cum-tax ticket prices, coupled with increases in base price and an unsupported justification for later revisions, showed that the benefit of tax reduction was not passed on to recipients. The DGAP's computation was accepted as consistent with the anti-profiteering methodology.

Conclusion: The respondent profiteered and contravened Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Issue (iii): Whether interest was payable on the profiteered amount under Rule 133(3)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.

Analysis: The interest component under the rule became operative from 28.06.2019. Since the violation period extended up to 30.06.2019, interest was confined to the statutory period after the rule came into force.

Conclusion: Interest was payable only from 28.06.2019 on the profiteered amount till deposit.

Issue (iv): Whether penalty was leviable under Section 171(3A) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Analysis: The penalty provision came into force on 01.01.2020, while the contravention period was earlier. The provision was therefore not applicable retrospectively.

Conclusion: No penalty was leviable.

Final Conclusion: The anti-profiteering report was upheld, the profiteered amount was directed to be deposited with applicable interest, and penalty was declined.

Ratio Decidendi: On reduction of GST rate, the supplier must pass on the benefit by commensurate reduction in price; non-passing of that benefit constitutes profiteering, while monetary consequences such as interest or penalty apply only in accordance with the temporal operation of the relevant rule or provision.

---