Prima facie assessment at discharge stage sustains prosecution where the order shows due consideration of relevant materials.

At the discharge stage under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the court is confined to a prima facie assessment and need not conduct a detailed evaluation of evidence. The Madras HC held that the trial court had considered the FIR, ECIR, Section 50 statements, property materials and evaluation reports, and had fairly reached a prima facie view that materials existed to proceed. Brief concluding paragraphs did not show non-application of mind or perversity when the order was read as a whole. In the absence of any jurisdictional defect or bar on prosecution, revisional interference was unwarranted and discharge was correctly refused.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order rejecting discharge under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 suffered from non-application of mind or perversity, and whether the materials disclosed a prima facie case for proceeding against the accused.

Analysis: At the discharge stage, the Court is required only to undertake a prima facie assessment and not a roving inquiry or a detailed evaluation of evidence. The impugned order, read as a whole, showed that the trial court had considered the FIR, the ECIR, the statements recorded under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the property materials and the evaluation reports, and had reached a prima facie view that there were materials to proceed. The Court held that the order could not be faulted merely because the concluding paragraphs were brief, since the earlier parts of the order reflected application of mind to the relevant materials. In the absence of any bar on prosecution or other jurisdictional defect, interference in revision was unwarranted.

Conclusion: The rejection of discharge was upheld and the accused was not entitled to discharge.

Final Conclusion: The revisional challenge failed because the trial court's prima facie assessment was found sufficient to sustain the prosecution at the charge stage.

Ratio Decidendi: In a discharge proceeding, the court need only determine whether the record discloses a prima facie case, and an order rejecting discharge will not be interfered with in revision if the order, read fairly and as a whole, shows consideration of the relevant materials and no perversity or non-application of mind.

---